Monday, June 15, 2015

Blogs Vs. Wikis

Blogs and wikis, explained simply, can almost be described to be similar things, but they serve different purposes. The way in which Blogs and Wikis are interacted with by the users are very much alike in the fact that they are both text based types of sites, they have a user who edits and adds pages and texts, and they are available for an audience of people to look and use the information. That's about where the similarities end, though.

Wikis are much more about collaboration with a set group of people towards an end goal, or a means. It is very unified and created to serve a purpose and access is generally only given to people who are considered part of a team or serve the general purpose of the Wiki. A blog is (usually) only written and maintained by a single person and the audience it is given to is essentially the entire internet. Anyone and everyone can stumble upon a blog and start reading. Blogs don't necessarily have to have a purpose, either. Many people just ramble or use it as a type of journal. Other people actually make their lively-hood off of blogs and generate passive income through programs like Google AdSense or Affiliate Marketing.

That's probably the one area in which Wikis have not been really used for, which is generating income. Every so often the people who own and run Wikipedia actually put up a message asking for donations to help keep Wikipedia running since it is not funded by any particular corporation and does not generate income on its own. If Wikipedia could work like a blog could and make money through ads and back linking and such, it would be able so sustain itself but it would also become a VERY different website. Being sponsored by corporations could lead the information available on Wikipedia to be affected in a way that is skewed in favor to the companies that fund them, which would then lead to the info on Wikipedia being much more unreliable than it is now. Probably one that people would not feel compelled to use, really. So it is most likely best that Wikipedia remain reliant on the donations of generous people.

Works Cited:
1.) Wikis at work: Up from the grassroots by Rob Edmonds E.learning Age; Oct 2006; p. 14
2.) "What motivates WIKIPEDIANS?" by Oded Nov, Communications of the ACM; Nov2007, Vol. 50 Issue 11, p60-64. 

2 comments:

  1. Same thought. Wiki should have run some Ads to get more income and improve their services. : )

    ReplyDelete
  2. I find it amazing how people can generate income just from blogs and other social media platforms. I wish I made a living off of it.

    ReplyDelete